mistaking ourselves for real

There’s a chalk board up front covered with an enthusiastic depiction of the plot line, the definition of “metaphor” and “simile”, and examples like “Her eyes are diamonds.” This is not literal. No one in their right mind believes the poor gal has jewels in her eye sockets. And yet we so constantly mistake ourselves for real, believe our true life stories, trapped in our characters like similes who forgot they were merely “like” or “as”.

–BHJ

QOTD

only one koan matters
you

~Ikkyu

QOTD: Jodorowsky on being creators

on the memetic/mimetic art theme, the current issue of Interview Mag (the one with a totally unrecognizable Katy Perry as the cover) has an interview with Alejandro Jodorowsky, the Chilean surrealist filmmaker who made the infamous art film “Holy Mountain” in 1973.  it’s really too bad it’s not online to share the whole thing because he is such an inspiration for right now. choice quote (emphasis added):

“I think in life there are very few creators.   There are a million imitators, but what is a person who imitates?  It’s just a superficial reproduction of things.  I am seeing today a multiplication of superficial work.  Photos, photos, photos, myself, myself, myself…. but a lack of humanity now.  You have all the communication, but what will you say?  I have Twitter, but I never say what I do or what I eat.  I am transpersonal.  I think art needs to be transpersonal. It needs to break from our individual limits.  It needs to go outside our common, collective humanity.  We are in MoMA right now, which is paradise. We are wit the spirits of art.  But outside, you have reality, which is very dangerous.  It’s in pain.  Nobody’s happy.  Not just economically, but also emotionally and creatively.  They have lost the meaning of politics, of religion, of health.  Today, medicine is an industry.  Everything’s industrial.  But I say the night makes the day.  After a night, it is the day, and not the reversal.  Not after the day is the night.  It is a positive message.  Everything that  happens in your life is for the good.  I don’t believe in political revolution.  I believe in poetical revolution.  That’s what I believe.  So where do we put the power?  In the consciousness.  Everything we do should be to open the mind of a person.”

i love this because it is the same mix of perceptions that i have, that while it contains what are superficially pessimistic realist statements (“Nobody’s happy”), this recognition of the darkness of the world feeds the belief that if we tune ourselves properly it will lead to light.

+obviously a screening of Holy Mountain is in our near future if anyone wants in.

QOTD: follow the leader

1st follower

QOTD: horizontalism

this was really beautiful to read, whether you take it for your personal life or political life or occupation:

My personal perspective has to do with the idea of freedom, this idea of discovering that we have collective knowledge that brings us together, gives us strength, starts the process of discovery. This is beyond revolutionary theories, theories that we all know and have heard so often, theories that are all too often converted into tools of oppression and submission. Constructing freedom is a learning process that can only happen in practice. For me, horizontalism, autonomy, freedom, creativity, and happiness are all concepts that go together, and they’re all things that have to both be practiced, and learned in practice.

I think back to previous activist experiences, and remember a powerful feeling of submission. This includes even my own behavior, which was often excessively rigid. It was difficult for me to enjoy myself, and enjoyment is something sane that strengthens you. Under capitalism, we were giving up the possibility of enjoying ourselves and being happy. We need to constantly break with this idea. We have life, and the life we have should be lived today. We shouldn’t wait to take power, so that we can begin to enjoy ourselves in the future. We should take it now. We begin by believing in what’s possible and then we push aside all of those things that don’t allow us to create this possibility.

— neka, a member of an unemployed workers’ movement

http://www.adbusters.org/magazine/100/horizontalism.html

also awesome from issue #100:

Because history doesn’t move in straight lines but surges like water, sometimes swirling, sometimes dripping, flowing, flooding–always unknowable, unexpected, uncertain. Because the key to insurgency is brilliant improvisation, not perfect blueprints.

–The Rebel Clown Army Manifesto

QOTD: Behaviour Guide

@occupyoakland: means and ends (post #13)

on the discussion of whether “black bloc” tactics are useful to social movements:

1. Interview with Chris Hedges:

We’re continuing our discussion of wanting to take the influence of money out of politics with Author and Truthout columnist Chris Hedges. Overturning Citizens United is just one step, but for those that have been monitoring the Occupy movement for over the last four months, they know that it’s about much more. But where does public opinion stand on Occupy now that the majority of the camps have been evicted? Now that we’ve seen in some cities, violence come into play, in what’s meant to be a peaceful movement. Hedges pin points the black bloc anarchists, and calls them the cancer within Occupy. And says that if their confrontational tactics begin to shape public opinion, and allow local governments to justify draconian forms of control, the Occupy movement is finished.

UPDATE 2/8/12: REBUTTAL TO HEDGES ET.AL.: THOSE WHO ARE AGAINST BLACK BLOC TACTICS DON’T UNDERSTAND THE CONTEXT

Chris Hedges’ “Black Bloc” takedown is only the most recent in a series of critiques bashing anarchists and “diversity of tactics” within the national Occupy movement since January 28th’s fog of tear gas has dissipated. While previous criticisms came from the right or center of the political spectrum, these perspectives are arising from the left and mainly from journalists who have not been in the field to witness these tactics in action and within context…

…Some in Occupy Oakland call a consistent pacifist protest approach a “position of privilege” – a position taken by those who have not been in a situation where they have needed to defend themselves against violence, be it economic, physical or otherwise. –Susie Cagle, Truthout

 

and to add a counterpoint to that, there is the Anonymous statement:

“This issue has been discussed many times during the past several months, and there appears to be a popular consensus that your tactics of chilling and intimidating the citizen press, breaking the windows of small businesses, terrorizing innocent employees and bystanders, and sometimes outright assaulting occupy protesters are unacceptable. You are at best misguided, harmful, and idiotic in your actions.”

the debate goes on and on.

2.  from Emma Goldman, My Disillusionment with Russia (the Afterward):

“The dominant, almost general, idea of revolution–particularly the Socialist idea-is that revolution is a violent change of social conditions through which one social class, the working class, becomes dominant over another class, the capitalist class. It is the conception of a purely physical change, and as such it involves only political scene shifting and institutional rearrangements….

There is no greater fallacy than the belief that aims and purposes are one thing, while methods and tactics are another. This fallacy is a potent menace to social regeneration.  All human experience teaches that methods and means cannot be separated from the ultimate aim.   The means employed become, through individual habit and social practice, part and parcel of the final purpose; they influence it, modify it, and presently the aims and means become identical…

…Applied in practice it means that the period of the actual revolution must be the introduction, the prelude to the new social conditions. It is the threshold to the new life, the new house of humanity. As such it must be of the same spirit as the new life it wishes to achieve, harmonious with the construction of the new edifice.

Today is the parent of tomorrow. The present casts its shadow far into the future.  That is the law of life, individual and social. Revolution that divests itself of ethical values thereby lays the foundation of injustice, deceit, and oppression for the future society. The means used to prepare the future become its cornerstone.

It cannot be sufficiently emphasized that revolution is in vain unless inspired by its ultimate ideal. Revolutionary methods must be in tune with revolutionary aims. The means used to further the revolution must harmonize with its purposes. In short, the ethical values which the revolution is to establish in the new society must be initiated by the revolutionary activities. The latter can only serve as a real and dependable bridge to the better life if they are built of the same material as the life to be achieved. Revolution is the mirror of the coming day; it is the child that is to be the human of tomorrow.

(thx @aB)

i am still all for the Occupy movement and its goals as a whole and support the factions that i think are doing Good, and many groups are!  they are being organized, functional, systematic, collaborative! so this is in NO WAY an indictment of those who have been working hard to put nonviolent principles into place for this movement. but particularly in Oakland, many still feel that black bloc is part of the “diversity of tactics” needed (that is: without some violent pushback, the pacifists will just get walked on).

even though that Susie Cagle update above is a most excellent rebuttal showing the complexity of this issue of “diversity of tactics”, which i was very glad to read and you should too,  I’m with Anonymous and Goldman, and the black bloc tactics of the OccupyOakland movement (not all, but some, and enough) is not being the change i wish to see (and YES I KNOW THE MEDIA IS SKEWING IT HARD).  there is enough violence in oakland that most residents would like it if the “black bloc” would rethink before they provoke an all out riot again. i mean:  THERE ARE PROTESTERS PROTESTING THE PROTEST  (which i think was AWESOME and IMPORTANT). we don’t need self-appointed pseudo-anarchists making it worse, trying to “prove a point” against the OPD.  (+please note that in post #11 i did advocate that the police leave protesters alone, that they are only making it worse and are certainly a huge part of the problem.) we all know how the OPD is. they’ve shown themselves repeatedly. the only point being proven now is that violence begets violence.

3. not to get all hippie on it but didn’t John Lennon teach us anything?

“We’re trying to sell peace, like a product, you know, and sell it like people sell soap or soft drinks. And it’s the only way to get people aware that peace is possible, and it isn’t just inevitable to have violence. Not just war — all forms of violence. People just accept it and think ‘Oh, they did it, or Harold Wilson did it, or Nixon did it,’ they’re always scapegoating people. And it isn’t Nixon’s fault. We’re all responsible for everything that goes on, you know, we’re all responsible for Biafra and Hitler and everything. So we’re just saying “SELL PEACE” — anybody interested in peace just stick it in the window. It’s simple but it lets somebody else know that you want peace too, because you feel alone if you’re the only one thinking ‘wouldn’t it be nice if there was peace and nobody was getting killed.’ So advertise yourself that you’re for peace if you believe in it.”

QOTD

“Don’t be afraid that your life will end; be afraid it will never begin.”

(?anon)

QOTD

Love is in the bones, not on the skin.

Filed in QOTD | Comment (0)

QOTD: i can’t get no

As long as I have a want, I have a reason for living. Satisfaction is death.

–George Bernard Shaw