OH: “no-latch”
OH some guy talking about how lucky he was to find a woman who was “no-latch”, and i thought: why is it considered a fault, a mental obsession, to “latch” onto someone, even if just temporarily, who has been trusted enough to be literally INSIDE YOU in a carnal and intimate way? i’m all for casual sex, but when someone gets a little infatuated for a minute afterward i don’t think it’s a sign of inscerity or instability. it’s natural (literally biochemical) and i hate that a lot of women get painted with this “needy” brush because they want some attention after intimacy, when to me it seems actually sort of weird and sociopathic if you can fuck someone and then just walk away the next day and not think about them. OTOH, stalking people and becoming unnaturally attached, especially if the feelings aren’t reciprocated, is obvi not good and if you have a tendency to do that then maybe you should rethink whether or not you can handle casual sex.
Filed in culture and random linkage | Comment (0)Leave a Reply
